First, the court left an appeal without a move to address the shortcomings: the applicant should have submitted documents confirming the payment of a court fee in the amount of 1 280 UAH. In addition, the applicant's representative was required to provide documents confirming his authority to represent the person in the Supreme Court (the Supreme Court of Ukraine was indicated in the relevant order).

However, in order to comply with the court ruling to remedy the deficiencies, the applicant's representative sent only a receipt for payment of the court fee in the amount of 1 280 UAH. and no documents were submitted that would confirm his authority in the Supreme Court. That is, the requirements of the court to leave the cassation without motion were not fully implemented by a lawyer.

And therefore, according to the frequent. 3 items 185, part 2 items 393 of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the court declared the complaint unspecified and returned.

According to the law, the return of the cassation appeal does not prevent a repeated appeal to the court if the circumstances that became the basis for its return will cease to exist.

The relevant ruling in the case No. 520/6550/17 was adopted by the Supreme Court on November 16, 2018. You can read the text of the ruling here.