Actions taken in the administrative process prior to the assignee's accession shall be binding on him to the extent that they would be binding on the person he replaced. This was indicated by the Seventh Administrative Court of Appeal.
The Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court within the Supreme Court referred the case No. 909/1294/15 to the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court because it considered it necessary to depart from the opinion given in the ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of December 22, 2009 in case No. 33 / 45-09 -1388.
On October 11, 2019 the President of Ukraine signed the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Encouraging Investment Activity in Ukraine”.
If the suspect changed his testimony after obtaining access to legal aid, this indicates the doubt of his voluntary refusal of a lawyer at the beginning of the interrogation. And this, combined with the lack of further assessment of such refusal by law enforcement agencies, constitutes a breach of the conventional safeguards.
An employee of the enterprise who was injured while performing his official duties appealed to the court with a demand to declare illegal and cancel the act of the special commission of the State Labor Organization, compiled on the basis of the investigation of an accident at work. In his opinion, such a dispute is public-law and must be decided according to the rules of administrative proceedings.
Violation of the essential requirements of the criminal procedural law, including the lack of audio recording of the process of review by the court of first instance of video materials, is the basis for the annulment of the decisions of the previous courts and the review of the decision by the court of first instance.