The person appealed to the court with a complaint in which he used an outrageous vocabulary, shamelessly described the state executor whose inaction was disputed, and argued that he appealed to the court for the protection of his rights precisely because the state executor has such characteristics.

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court noted that regardless of whether all the decrees, which set out the legal position from which the Grand Chamber retreated, are listed, the courts should take into account the most recent legal position of the Grand Chamber when resolving identical disputes.